Outrage is growing in Ipswich and across Queensland as at least seven greyhounds have tragically died from injuries sustained at the new multi-million dollar “The Q” racing track, even before its official opening.
This alarming number contradicts earlier assurances that the facility would be the “safest possible” for animals, prompting strong protests and calls for independent oversight.
The three-track complex at Purga, near Ipswich, began trials in March ahead of its official grand opening. The Queensland Government invested a substantial $44.15 million from the racing infrastructure fund towards the $85 million facility, which now serves as the new home for the Brisbane and Ipswich greyhound clubs.
Protesters Demand Action
More than 100 people, travelling from as far as the Sunshine Coast and Northern Rivers, rallied at “The Q’s” grand opening to voice their anger over the escalating number of greyhound deaths and injuries. Supported by prominent animal welfare groups like the Coalition for the Protection of Greyhounds, Friends of the Hound – Greyhound Adoption Group, and Animal Welfare League Queensland, demonstrators declared they won’t stay silent.
They’re calling it “taxpayer-funded cruelty” and are demanding an end to what they see as the exploitation and harm of animals by an industry backed by major political parties.
The Coalition for the Protection of Greyhounds claims eight dogs have died during trials, with seven of these deaths independently confirmed. Records reveal harrowing incidents, including two greyhounds euthanised in late March due to hock fractures.
Other confirmed fatalities include Federal Recall, Travis’ Scrub, Feed Him Mungo, Hara’s Mickey, and Spring Freya, all of whom died after sustaining injuries during trials in April and May. The Coalition also suggests that 17 greyhounds have died across Queensland this year alone.
Calls for Independent Scrutiny Intensify
The president of the Coalition for the Protection of Greyhounds, Amy MacMahon, is urging an immediate safety review of the industry, stating that the community no longer supports greyhounds dying for international gambling companies. Ipswich MP Jennifer Howard, a vocal opponent of the track, echoed these sentiments, advocating for an independent body, separate from the industry, to scrutinise its operations. She also pointed out that over 10,000 submissions were received against the track when it was first proposed.
Amanda Holly, campaign manager for AnimalKind and an Ipswich resident, expressed concerns about the facility’s impact on local gambling issues. She firmly believes that greyhound racing simply cannot be made safe for the animals. Holly highlighted the high speeds and multiple dogs on the track as inherent dangers, noting that many countries have already moved away from the industry due to welfare concerns.
Industry and Government Defend Practices
A spokesperson for Racing Minister Tim Mander stated that the state government takes animal welfare “very seriously” and that ensuring high standards of care for racing animals is a key priority for the ongoing Racing Review. Racing Queensland, in a statement, affirmed that animal welfare is at the core of its decision-making, reporting nearly $1 million spent on greyhound welfare initiatives in the 2024 financial year.
The organisation also claimed that approximately 3 per cent of greyhounds across all Queensland tracks incur injuries, with most able to return to racing within two weeks. The Queensland Racing Integrity Commission reiterated its commitment to reducing injury rates through continuous analysis and education.
Premier David Crisafulli has publicly supported the greyhound racing industry, describing it as “part of the fabric of our society” that offers an accessible social and recreational outlet for many. While he acknowledged the importance of continually lifting animal welfare standards, the Premier affirmed his belief in the industry’s future in Queensland.
Published Date 11-Jun-2025
